Question: Dear Sergey, Thank you for the last answer, it really helped me. You simply can not imagine what happened to me then was. I almost was not far from tsuisida. It seemed to me that it is better to die than to live with HIV. It was at that moment I received your letter. That is your letter to me quietly beginning to return to life. There was a moment of your letter where you wrote "… Sufficient time to detect. And I began to go on but waiting for 6 months. I now there are new questions, please if you can answer me on them. I passed the test re-ELISA is a 158 days (5 months 5 days (could not stand exactly 25 days) of high-risk exposure results -. In addition, passed various tests other than HIV, such as syphilis, stroke = was detected only molluscum contagiosum. And so Questions: 1. Is it enough this time for HIV if I had never used drugs, never been sick, rarely drink alcohol, smoke. "Also, purely for information – I was born in 7 months, its first year of life was very weak and often sick but stoichiometric never been to the hospital was not listed. Do I have to again take the ELISA for HIV? 2. How to treat molluscum contagiosum as tearing apart with tweezers, if there were any more without the disease means? "I ask you as far as possible answer to these questions. I await your reply look. If you can send an answer by mail. With a sense of profound gratitude. Mirlan
Answer: About the shellfish is better to consult a dermatologist. But we remove them with tweezers. With respect to HIV test. There are certain standard time of the survey. It makes sense to abide by them. Your result by 158, in my opinion, can be trusted as definitive. But, from a formal point of view, it is not in time. . . I propose to do what's right. This will allow the avoidance of doubt as to your hand, and from the doctors, who will evaluate these results, if necessary. Be an optimist, everything will be like. Sincerely, Zakharenko SM